|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Lizhia Birath
   |
Posted - 2009.03.24 21:49:00 -
[1]
Hey, could we get some sort of list of all the alliances that has had their names changed coz they whished to and not coz it was offensive or in some other way forced?
Could someone at CCP also please specify in what timeframe a namechange petition should be filed and what criteria needs to be filled for it to be OK?
Right now it stands at up to atleast 3 months after alliance creation (I think) and simply need to be the wish of the members, even thou they at the time of joining had ample opportunity to creat a new alliance named in whatever way they wanted(But chose not to)
|
Lizhia Birath
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 22:27:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Auroral Borealis
This name change probably stems from the original petition that ex-BoB filed concerning the possible hacking of Haargoth's (or whatever his name was) account. In the mean time BoB took on the ticker and name of an alt alliance as an interim measure due to the complexity of the petition. No doubt CCP investigated the allegations. This isn't favoritism in the slightest, it's a simple result of that petition. No rules were broken, because the name "Band of Brothers Reloaded." and "KenGoKu" were just switched when the petition was finished... If the petition could have been handled instantly, perhaps they would have been able to get their BoB reloaded ticker right away. Who knows.
This is not a big deal. AT all. I'm as glad as anyone else that BoB/Kengoku are getting hammered in delve/querious, but this is just stupid nonsense. Don't worry though - maybe if everyone spams more "OMG CCP DEV HAX BOB T20" it'll turn into a scandal through sheer repitition.
How come they didnt creat a new alliance with the name Band of brothers reloaded from the get go and instead choose to jump in on a excisting alt alliance?
|
Lizhia Birath
Minmatar
Rogue Industrial Group
The Fifth Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 22:33:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ben Derindar
I feel sorry for Grimmi tbh. The GMs aren't under any obligation to ever explain themselves, but they did so here anyway. True, it's not a good look for them that the decision has taken this long to reach, but it has still been reached. And this is what they get for going out of their way.
It would be sad if the fact that, most of those who are whining the loudest about all this, belong to alliances that have long claimed to take pride in not taking internet spaceships oh so seriously, wasn't also so very amusing at the same time.
/Ben
"Could you please explain why you did as you did?"
"Coz I felt like it."
"Uh oh ok."
Case closed
|
|
|
| |
|